LIVE
The AI Parity Index0.1%Tasks measured1 of 18,796Unemployment4.1% · Jul 20260.1 pt vs Jun 2026Payrolls−23K m/m · Jul 2026158.9M employedJob openings7.4M · Jun 20260.2M vs May 2026Wages$37.62/h avg · Jul 2026+3.2% y/yProductivity+1.4% q/q ann. · Q2 2026Inflation+3.4% y/y · Jul 2026Next upSoftware Developers · 16 more tasksNext releaseQ4 2026
The AI Parity Index0.1%Tasks measured1 of 18,796Unemployment4.1% · Jul 20260.1 pt vs Jun 2026Payrolls−23K m/m · Jul 2026158.9M employedJob openings7.4M · Jun 20260.2M vs May 2026Wages$37.62/h avg · Jul 2026+3.2% y/yProductivity+1.4% q/q ann. · Q2 2026Inflation+3.4% y/y · Jul 2026Next upSoftware Developers · 16 more tasksNext releaseQ4 2026
Modify existing software to correct errors, adapt it to new hardware, or…Verified run

Diagnose → fix hand-off · Claude Opus

Reached the human bar.

Software Developers · O*NET task 21670 · 9 instances × 3 runs · release 2026-08

WHO WROTE THE BETTER CODE · JUDGED BY GPT-5.6 (SPARK QUALITY JUDGE)

On the code itself, the human team still wins.

The agent team matched the humans on the test, nine tickets out of nine. Judged on the quality of the code rather than whether it passes, the humans wrote the better fix six times, the agents twice, and once the two were identical.

6

Human team

2

Agent team

1

Same fix

  • humanThe human team reuses the existing user setup and only adds the missing email after resetting, while the agent team duplicates that setup in a new block that could drift over time.
  • humanThe human team uses the dedicated user picker so each selected person is handled as a new choice, while the agent team only adapts the existing text-search flow.
  • humanThe human team also changes the upgrade links so they no longer depend on a wrongly configured domain, while the agent team only changes how such links are opened and leaves the broken links in place.
  • humanThe human team returns the user to the exact page they were viewing, while the agent team can discard any extra page details such as filters or a specific section.
  • humanThe human team safely handles the case where the card window is already gone without adding a broad workaround that hides type mistakes.
  • humanThe human team uses the tenant’s site name when available and safely falls back to Minds, while the agent team can show “to undefined” because it builds the text before the site name is assigned.
  • agentsThe agent team changes only the video sound behavior requested, while the human team also changes unrelated cleanup code.
  • agentsThe agent team also uses the default audio image when no audio thumbnail is present, while the human team only switches to the audio thumbnail field.
  • sameThe human team and the agent team made exactly the same change, so neither is better.

Model-judged, not machine-checked. This is a second opinion on code quality, not the pass-fail criterion, and it does not move the Index.

Success

100%

Runs passed

27/27

Cost per fix

$0.29

Time per fix

19s

Uplift vs human

×79

Method

Test subjectMinds, open-source social platform, 10+ year Angular codebase, public git history
Instance selection2,704 merged tickets → 45 ship a runnable test → 9 validated red-to-green for this pilot
Resolve criterionthe ticket's own test fails on the bug and passes on the fix, with the existing suite still green; executed, never judged
Repetitions3 independent runs per ticket per configuration, 27 runs per configuration
ModelClaude Opus in the three structure configurations; GPT-5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro run the identical one-shot protocol (August 2026 rerun on the same instance set)
AI cost basistoken list-price estimate per fix
Human baseline basissuccess: the shipped fixes (measured). Time and cost: inferred from 2–4h at $75–100/h; not measured
Run windowAugust 2026

Scope and limitations

Populationwell-specified, test-backed, buildable bugs in one Angular codebase; not software bugs in general
Resolvepasses the team's own test; a strong proxy for correct, not a proof of it
Localizationthe agent is handed the right files; real work includes finding the fault
Cost and baselineAI cost is a token list-price estimate; the human figure is inferred, not measured
Samplea 9-bug pilot; production accuracy needs more cases and more repetitions for tighter confidence

Results by instance

Open any instance for the complete evidence: the ticket as written, the test that judges it, and the exact patch this configuration produced beside the patch the human team shipped. Every patch is checksummed.

2746Audio pause on destroy3/3$0.12

base f1e8f68baa0c · test: src/app/modules/media/components/audio/services/audio-player.service.spec.ts · files changed: src/app/modules/media/components/audio/services/audio-player.service.ts · Fix audio pause events triggering on component destroy front#6219

THE TICKET, AS WRITTEN

<!---
Please read this!

The Definition of Done (DoD) can be found at https://developers.minds.com/docs/handbook/how-we-work/#definition-of-done
--->

### Ticket(s) / Related Merge Requests

https://gitlab.com/minds/front/-/issues/6219

### Summary of Changes

Fix audio pause events triggering on component destroy.

### Testing Considerations

1. Go to a feed with audio
2. Go off the feed
3. Check there are no events in Posthog (may be a delay)
4. Go to a feed with audio
5. Play and pause some audio
6. Check the events appear in Posthog.

### Deployment Considerations

Standard deployment.

### Regression Scope

- Audio analytics. 
- Player pausing.

### Platform Affected (web, mobile, etc)
 …

THIS CONFIGURATION’S PATCH · sha c4d2d54c666a · 3/3 · identical to the shipped human fix, same checksum

--- a/src/app/modules/media/components/audio/services/audio-player.service.ts+++ b/src/app/modules/media/components/audio/services/audio-player.service.ts@@ -145,6 +145,9 @@    * @returns { void }    */   public pause(): void {+    if (!this.isActivePlayer || !this.playing$.getValue()) {+      return;+    }     this.globalAudioPlayerService.pause();     this.trackPauseEvent();   }

AI QUALITY JUDGE · CLAUDE

The patch is identical to the fix the human team shipped, byte for byte. Same checksum.

2721Join group by invite3/3$0.96

base c52c269ca9cd · test: src/app/common/services/group-membership.service.spec.ts · files changed: src/app/common/services/group-membership.service.ts · Fix joining a group by invite when already on group page front#6202

THE TICKET, AS WRITTEN

<!---
Please read this!

The Definition of Done (DoD) can be found at https://developers.minds.com/docs/handbook/how-we-work/#definition-of-done
--->

### Ticket(s) / Related Merge Requests

front#6202

### Summary of Changes

Fixes an issue wherein when a user is ALREADY on a group page, and accepts a group invite notification, the group does not automatically reload.

### Testing Considerations

- [x] When on a group page and accepting an invite to the same group, the group is reloaded, with me in a joined state.
- [x] When on another page and accepting an invite, I am navigated to the group in a joined state.

### Deployment Considerations

Standard deployment.

### Regression Scope

Grou …

THIS CONFIGURATION’S PATCH · sha d670cdab9488 · 3/3

--- a/src/app/common/services/group-membership.service.ts+++ b/src/app/common/services/group-membership.service.ts@@ -166,12 +166,19 @@                 );               } -              // only navigate if requested, and the user is not already on the page.-              if (-                groupJoinOptions?.navigateOnSuccess &&-                !this.router.url.includes(`/group/${groupGuid}`)-              ) {-                this.router.navigateByUrl(`/group/${groupGuid}`);+              if (groupJoinOptions?.navigateOnSuccess) {+                if (this.router.url.includes(`/group/${groupGuid}`)) {+                  // already on the group page - force a reload by+                  // navigating away and back.+                  this.router+                    .navigateByUrl('/', { skipLocationChange: true })+                    .then(() => {+                      this.router.navigateByUrl(`/group/${groupGuid}`);+                    });+                } else {+                  // navigate to the group page.+                  this.router.navigateByUrl(`/group/${groupGuid}`);+                }               }               return;             }

THE HUMAN TEAM’S PATCH · sha b1fd985b3d88 · shipped

--- a/src/app/common/services/group-membership.service.ts+++ b/src/app/common/services/group-membership.service.ts@@ -167,11 +167,18 @@               }                // only navigate if requested, and the user is not already on the page.-              if (-                groupJoinOptions?.navigateOnSuccess &&-                !this.router.url.includes(`/group/${groupGuid}`)-              ) {-                this.router.navigateByUrl(`/group/${groupGuid}`);+              if (groupJoinOptions?.navigateOnSuccess) {+                if (!this.router.url.includes(`/group/${groupGuid}`)) {+                  this.router.navigateByUrl(`/group/${groupGuid}`);+                } else {+                  // Force a route refresh if the user is already on the page.+                  const currentUrl: string = this.router.url;+                  this.router+                    .navigateByUrl('/', { skipLocationChange: true })+                    .then(() => {+                      this.router.navigateByUrl(currentUrl);+                    });+                }               }               return;             }

AI QUALITY JUDGE · CLAUDE

Passed all three runs, with the same idea as the human team: detect that the user is already on the group page and force a reload.

The code is organized slightly differently but does the same thing.

2698Group invite form3/3$0.19

base 4ba331e9a767 · test: src/app/modules/groups/v2/invite/invite.component.spec.ts · files changed: src/app/modules/groups/v2/invite/invite.component.ts · Fix group invite form #6190

THE TICKET, AS WRITTEN

<!---
Please read this!

The Definition of Done (DoD) can be found at https://developers.minds.com/docs/handbook/how-we-work/#definition-of-done
--->

### Ticket(s) / Related Merge Requests

Closes https://gitlab.com/minds/front/-/issues/6190

### Summary of Changes

Fix issue with group invite form preventing multiple members from being invited in a row.

### Testing Considerations

- [x] I can invite a user that I'm subscribed to by clicking their row from the search bar.
- [x] I can invite a second user that I'm subscribed to by clicking their row from the search bar.
- [x] I can invite a user that I'm subscribed to by typing their name into the search bar and clicking submit without clic …

THIS CONFIGURATION’S PATCH · sha fef2c396d353 · 3/3

--- a/src/app/modules/groups/v2/invite/invite.component.ts+++ b/src/app/modules/groups/v2/invite/invite.component.ts@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@   OnInit, } from '@angular/core'; import { GroupInviteService } from './invite.service';+import { ToasterService } from '../../../../common/services/toaster.service'; import { MindsUser } from '../../../../interfaces/entities'; import {   AbstractControl,@@ -19,7 +20,7 @@   EntityResolverService,   EntityResolverServiceOptions, } from '../../../../common/services/entity-resolver.service';-import { Subscription, distinctUntilChanged, switchMap } from 'rxjs';+import { Subscription, debounceTime, distinctUntilChanged, of, switchMap } from 'rxjs'; import { MindsGroup } from '../group.model';  /**@@ -67,13 +68,14 @@   constructor(     public service: GroupInviteService,     private fb: UntypedFormBuilder,+    private toasterService: ToasterService,     private entityResolverService: EntityResolverService,     private changeDetector: ChangeDetectorRef   ) {}    ngOnInit(): void {     this.formGroup = this.fb.group({-      username: [+      user: [         '',         {           validators: [Validators.required],@@ -83,27 +85,30 @@     });      this.subscriptions.push(-      this.formGroup.controls.username.valueChanges+      this.formGroup.controls.user.valueChanges         .pipe(+          debounceTime(200),           distinctUntilChanged(),-          switchMap((username: string) => {-            if (username === '') {-              this.invitee = null;-              this.refreshEligibilityValidator();-              return;-            } else {-              this.inProgress = true;-              let options = new EntityResolverServiceOptions();-              options.refType = 'username';-              options.ref = username;--              return this.entityResolverService.get$<MindsUser>(options);+          switchMap((user: string | MindsUser) => {+            if (!user) {+              return of(null);             }++            if (typeof user !== 'string') {+              return of(user);+            }++            this.inProgress = true;+            let options = new EntityResolverServiceOptions();+            options.refType = 'username';+            options.ref = user;++            return this.entityResolverService.get$<MindsUser>(options);           })         )         .subscribe((user) => {           this.inProgress = false;-          this.invitee = user;+          this.invitee = user || null;           this.refreshEligibilityValidator();         })     );@@ -136,19 +141,31 @@    * Submit an invitation to the selected user    */   async onSubmit(): Promise<void> {+    if (!this.invitee) {+      console.error('No invitee selected');+      return;+    }++    if (!this.invitee.subscriber) {+      this.toasterService.error(+        'You can only invite users who are subscribed to you'+      );+      return;+    }+     await this.service.invite(this.invitee);      // Reset the form     this.invitee = null;     this.formGroup.reset(       {-        username: '',+        user: null,       },       {         emitEvent: false,       }     );-    this.formGroup.get('username').setErrors(null);+    this.formGroup.get('user').setErrors(null);     this.formGroup.markAsPristine();     this.changeDetector.detectChanges();   }@@ -172,6 +189,8 @@           eligibilityInvalid: true,         };       }++      return null;     };   } @@ -181,21 +200,21 @@     this.removeEligibilityValidator();      this.latestEligibilityValidator = this.eligibilityValidator();-    this.formGroup.controls.username?.addValidators(+    this.formGroup.controls.user?.addValidators(       this.latestEligibilityValidator     ); -    this.formGroup.controls.username?.updateValueAndValidity({+    this.formGroup.controls.user?.updateValueAndValidity({       emitEvent: false,     }); -    this.formGroup.controls.username?.markAsDirty();+    this.formGroup.controls.user?.markAsDirty();      this.changeDetector.detectChanges();   }    private removeEligibilityValidator(): void {-    this.formGroup.controls.username?.removeValidators(+    this.formGroup.controls.user?.removeValidators(       this.latestEligibilityValidator     );   }

THE HUMAN TEAM’S PATCH · sha c887764c12c6 · shipped

--- a/src/app/modules/groups/v2/invite/invite.component.ts+++ b/src/app/modules/groups/v2/invite/invite.component.ts@@ -8,19 +8,18 @@ import { GroupInviteService } from './invite.service'; import { MindsUser } from '../../../../interfaces/entities'; import {-  AbstractControl,   UntypedFormBuilder,   UntypedFormGroup,-  ValidationErrors,-  ValidatorFn,   Validators, } from '@angular/forms';+import { debounceTime, of, Subscription, switchMap } from 'rxjs';+import { MindsGroup } from '../group.model';+import { AutoCompleteEntityTypeEnum } from '../../../../common/components/forms/autocomplete-entity-input/autocomplete-entity-input.component';+import { ToasterService } from '../../../../common/services/toaster.service'; import {   EntityResolverService,   EntityResolverServiceOptions, } from '../../../../common/services/entity-resolver.service';-import { Subscription, distinctUntilChanged, switchMap } from 'rxjs';-import { MindsGroup } from '../group.model';  /**  * Invite modal component@@ -37,6 +36,10 @@   providers: [GroupInviteService], }) export class GroupInviteComponent implements OnInit, OnDestroy {+  /** Enum for use in template. */+  protected readonly AutoCompleteEntityTypeEnum: typeof AutoCompleteEntityTypeEnum =+    AutoCompleteEntityTypeEnum;+   /**    * Modal save handler    */@@ -67,13 +70,14 @@   constructor(     public service: GroupInviteService,     private fb: UntypedFormBuilder,-    private entityResolverService: EntityResolverService,-    private changeDetector: ChangeDetectorRef+    private changeDetector: ChangeDetectorRef,+    private toasterService: ToasterService,+    private entityResolverService: EntityResolverService   ) {}    ngOnInit(): void {     this.formGroup = this.fb.group({-      username: [+      user: [         '',         {           validators: [Validators.required],@@ -83,28 +87,28 @@     });      this.subscriptions.push(-      this.formGroup.controls.username.valueChanges-        .pipe(-          distinctUntilChanged(),-          switchMap((username: string) => {-            if (username === '') {-              this.invitee = null;-              this.refreshEligibilityValidator();-              return;-            } else {-              this.inProgress = true;+      this.formGroup+        .get('user')+        .valueChanges.pipe(+          debounceTime(200),+          switchMap((user: string | MindsUser) => {+            // fallback for if the user does not click on the autocomplete result.+            if (typeof user === 'string') {               let options = new EntityResolverServiceOptions();               options.refType = 'username';-              options.ref = username;-+              options.ref = user;               return this.entityResolverService.get$<MindsUser>(options);             }+            return of(user);           })         )-        .subscribe((user) => {+        .subscribe((user: MindsUser): void => {+          if (!user) {+            this.invitee = null;+            return;+          }           this.inProgress = false;           this.invitee = user;-          this.refreshEligibilityValidator();         })     );   }@@ -136,19 +140,31 @@    * Submit an invitation to the selected user    */   async onSubmit(): Promise<void> {-    await this.service.invite(this.invitee);+    if (!this.invitee) {+      console.error('No invitee selected');+      return;+    }++    if (!this.invitee.subscriber) {+      this.toasterService.error(+        'You can only invite users who are subscribed to you'+      );+      return;+    }++    this.service.invite(this.invitee);      // Reset the form     this.invitee = null;     this.formGroup.reset(       {-        username: '',+        user: null,       },       {         emitEvent: false,       }     );-    this.formGroup.get('username').setErrors(null);+    this.formGroup.get('user').setErrors(null);     this.formGroup.markAsPristine();     this.changeDetector.detectChanges();   }@@ -161,42 +177,4 @@   public isModerator(group: MindsGroup): boolean {     return group['is:owner'] || group['is:moderator'];   }--  /**-   * Ensure we are not trying to invite someone who is not a subscriber-   */-  private eligibilityValidator(): ValidatorFn {-    return (control: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null => {-      if (this.invitee && !this.invitee.subscriber) {-        return {-          eligibilityInvalid: true,-        };-      }-    };-  }--  private latestEligibilityValidator: ValidatorFn = null;--  private refreshEligibilityValidator(): void {-    this.removeEligibilityValidator();--    this.latestEligibilityValidator = this.eligibilityValidator();-    this.formGroup.controls.username?.addValidators(-      this.latestEligibilityValidator-    );--    this.formGroup.controls.username?.updateValueAndValidity({-      emitEvent: false,-    });--    this.formGroup.controls.username?.markAsDirty();--    this.changeDetector.detectChanges();-  }--  private removeEligibilityValidator(): void {-    this.formGroup.controls.username?.removeValidators(-      this.latestEligibilityValidator-    );-  } }

AI QUALITY JUDGE · CLAUDE

Passed all three runs, with the same changes as the loop: the renamed field, the short delay before lookups, and the error message service.

Like the loop, it skipped the human team's bigger step of replacing the search box, which the test does not require.

2696Chatwoot emails3/3$0.18

base 3c8f56a702df · test: src/app/common/components/chatwoot-widget/chatwoot-widget.component.spec.ts · files changed: src/app/common/components/chatwoot-widget/chatwoot-widget.component.ts · Fix Chatwoot emails minds#4948

THE TICKET, AS WRITTEN

<!---
Please read this!

The Definition of Done (DoD) can be found at https://developers.minds.com/docs/handbook/how-we-work/#definition-of-done
--->

### Ticket(s) / Related Merge Requests

minds#4948

### Summary of Changes

Fixes an issue where Chatwoot user held locally is out of sync with Chatwoot servers, by resetting the user if one is not set locally on bubble click.

### Testing Considerations

Note that email will NOT be passed to chatwoot if a user already exists with that email. I strongly recommend using plus addressing (e.g. example+chatwoot1@minds.com) to give your account a new email to test - and you can delete the contact from Chatwoot to retest.

Between tests you want to  …

THIS CONFIGURATION’S PATCH · sha abe8b963a978 · 3/3

--- a/src/app/common/components/chatwoot-widget/chatwoot-widget.component.ts+++ b/src/app/common/components/chatwoot-widget/chatwoot-widget.component.ts@@ -205,9 +205,46 @@   private onBubbleClick(event: Event): void {     const currentChatwootUser = this.window.$chatwoot?.user; -    if (currentChatwootUser && !currentChatwootUser?.email) {+    if (!currentChatwootUser) {+      // Local Chatwoot user is out of sync with server; reset and re-set it.+      this.resetAndSetUser(); // async+      return;+    }++    if (!currentChatwootUser?.email) {       this.patchEmail(); // async     }+  }++  /**+   * Reset chatwoot and set the user afresh (including email) when the locally+   * held user is not set. Expects the current session to be logged in.+   * @returns { Promise<void> }+   */+  private async resetAndSetUser(): Promise<void> {+    if (!this.session.isLoggedIn()) {+      return;+    }++    const loggedInUser: MindsUser = this.session.getLoggedInUser();++    if (!loggedInUser) {+      return;+    }++    const [identifierHash, emailAddress]: [string, string] = await Promise.all([+      this.getIdentifierHash(),+      this.emailAddressService.getEmailAddress(),+    ]);++    this.resetChatwoot();++    this.window.$chatwoot.setUser(loggedInUser.guid, {+      name: `@${loggedInUser.username}`,+      identifier_hash: identifierHash,+      avatar_url: this.userAvatar.getSrc(),+      email: emailAddress,+    });   }    /**

THE HUMAN TEAM’S PATCH · sha d695d452d187 · shipped

--- a/src/app/common/components/chatwoot-widget/chatwoot-widget.component.ts+++ b/src/app/common/components/chatwoot-widget/chatwoot-widget.component.ts@@ -174,15 +174,19 @@    /**    * Sets user for widget.+   * @param { { email?: string } } additionalProps - additional properties to set on the user.    * @returns { Promise<void> }    */-  private async setUser(): Promise<void> {+  private async setUser(+    additionalProps: { email?: string } = {}+  ): Promise<void> {     const user: MindsUser = this.session.getLoggedInUser();      this.window.$chatwoot.setUser(user.guid, {       name: `@${user.username}`,       identifier_hash: await this.getIdentifierHash(),       avatar_url: this.userAvatar.getSrc(),+      ...additionalProps,     });   } @@ -202,11 +206,22 @@    * @param { Event } event - click event.    * @returns { void }    */-  private onBubbleClick(event: Event): void {+  private async onBubbleClick(event: Event): Promise<void> {+    if (!this.session.isLoggedIn()) {+      return;+    }+     const currentChatwootUser = this.window.$chatwoot?.user; -    if (currentChatwootUser && !currentChatwootUser?.email) {-      this.patchEmail(); // async+    if (!currentChatwootUser) {+      // clear any lingering state as it's gotten out of sync.+      this.resetChatwoot();++      // set the user again with the email address.+      this.setUser({ email: await this.emailAddressService.getEmailAddress() });+      return;+    } else if (!currentChatwootUser?.email) {+      this.patchEmail();     }   } 

AI QUALITY JUDGE · CLAUDE

Passed all three runs. Same result as the human fix: reset the chat widget and re-register the user with their email.

The agent's version adds a couple of extra safety checks and fetches the two needed values in parallel. Different shape, same behavior.

2735Tenant site name3/3$0.05

base c7a590bf3c58 · test: src/app/modules/auth/reset-password-modal/forms/request/request.component.spec.ts · files changed: src/app/modules/auth/reset-password-modal/forms/request/request.component.ts · Fix incorrect site name in tenant forgot password flow #6209

THE TICKET, AS WRITTEN

<!---
Please read this!

The Definition of Done (DoD) can be found at https://developers.minds.com/docs/handbook/how-we-work/#definition-of-done
--->

### Ticket(s) / Related Merge Requests

#6209

### Summary of Changes

The incorrect site name is used in the forgot password flow for Tenants. The text is hard-coded to be `Minds` when it should use the `site_name`.

### Testing Considerations

Bound to https://fausto.oke.minds.io

#### Tenant

- [ ] After entering username in forgot password, the subsequent panel gives me the option to `Log in to {{tenant site name}}`.
 
#### Non-tenant

- [ ] After entering username in forgot password, the subsequent panel gives me the option to `Log in to  …

THIS CONFIGURATION’S PATCH · sha e98e5e78df8c · 3/3

--- a/src/app/modules/auth/reset-password-modal/forms/request/request.component.ts+++ b/src/app/modules/auth/reset-password-modal/forms/request/request.component.ts@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@   Validators, } from '@angular/forms'; import { Subscription } from 'rxjs';+import { SITE_NAME } from '../../../../../common/injection-tokens/common-injection-tokens'; import {   MIN_MS_BETWEEN_RESET_PASSWORD_EMAILS,   ResetPasswordModalPanel,@@ -35,10 +36,13 @@    protected secondsBetweenResends: number; +  protected readonly loginToText: string = `to ${this.siteName}`;+   constructor(     protected toaster: ToasterService,     private formBuilder: FormBuilder,-    protected service: ResetPasswordModalService+    protected service: ResetPasswordModalService,+    @Inject(SITE_NAME) private siteName: string   ) {}    ngOnInit(): void {

THE HUMAN TEAM’S PATCH · sha 6909acfedf5c · shipped

--- a/src/app/modules/auth/reset-password-modal/forms/request/request.component.ts+++ b/src/app/modules/auth/reset-password-modal/forms/request/request.component.ts@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@   ResetPasswordModalPanel,   ResetPasswordModalService, } from '../../reset-password-modal.service';+import { SITE_NAME } from '../../../../../common/injection-tokens/common-injection-tokens';  /**  * Form for the user to submit a request for a@@ -34,12 +35,16 @@   protected canSendEmail: boolean = true;    protected secondsBetweenResends: number;+  protected readonly loginToText: string;    constructor(     protected toaster: ToasterService,     private formBuilder: FormBuilder,-    protected service: ResetPasswordModalService-  ) {}+    protected service: ResetPasswordModalService,+    @Inject(SITE_NAME) protected siteName: string+  ) {+    this.loginToText = $localize`:@@RESET_PASSWORD__EMAIL_SENT_PANEL__LOGIN_LINK__TO_SITE:to ${this.siteName || 'Minds'}:site name:`;+  }    ngOnInit(): void {     // Always show the first panel on load

AI QUALITY JUDGE · CLAUDE

Passed all three runs with the same core fix as the human team: pull in the site's name and use it in the login text.

Like the loop, it skips the translation wrapper and the 'Minds' fallback that the humans added. The test does not check those.

2740Muted modal video3/3$0.04

base 5420b630517a · test: src/app/modules/media/components/video-player/scrollaware-player.component.spec.ts · files changed: src/app/modules/media/components/video-player/scrollaware-player.component.ts · Fix videos in modals starting muted #6215

THE TICKET, AS WRITTEN

<!---
Please read this!

The Definition of Done (DoD) can be found at https://developers.minds.com/docs/handbook/how-we-work/#definition-of-done
--->

### Ticket(s) / Related Merge Requests

#6215

### Summary of Changes

When a video is opened in a modal, it was forcing the play of the video MUTED, when the autoplay setting was on.
This change will set it to unmuted when opened in a modal, with autoplay on.

### Testing Considerations

- [x] Autoplay ON; videos on SEPs open in a modal and autoplay and autoplay unmuted
- [x] Autoplay ON; videos in narrow viewports open in a modal and autoplay unmuted 
- [x] Autoplay OFF; videos open in a modal, and upon pressing play are unmuted (this change …

THIS CONFIGURATION’S PATCH · sha 1e89302756f8 · 3/3

--- a/src/app/modules/media/components/video-player/scrollaware-player.component.ts+++ b/src/app/modules/media/components/video-player/scrollaware-player.component.ts@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@       !user.disable_autoplay_videos     ) {       this.player.play({-        muted: true,+        muted: !this.isModal,         hideControls: true,       });       this.detectChanges();

THE HUMAN TEAM’S PATCH · sha c9faa10e46da · shipped

--- a/src/app/modules/media/components/video-player/scrollaware-player.component.ts+++ b/src/app/modules/media/components/video-player/scrollaware-player.component.ts@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@   }    ngOnDestroy() {-    this.scrollSubscription.unsubscribe();+    this.scrollSubscription?.unsubscribe();   }    ngAfterViewInit() {@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@       !user.disable_autoplay_videos     ) {       this.player.play({-        muted: true,+        muted: !this.isModal,         hideControls: true,       });       this.detectChanges();

AI QUALITY JUDGE · CLAUDE

Passed all three runs with the exact same one-line fix the humans shipped: only mute the video when it is not in the pop-up viewer.

The shipped patch carries one extra safety guard the test does not exercise.

2741Audio og:image3/3$0.56

base 5420b630517a · test: src/app/modules/newsfeed/single/single.component.spec.ts · files changed: src/app/modules/newsfeed/single/single.component.ts · Fix audio og:image's front#6216

THE TICKET, AS WRITTEN

<!---
Please read this!

The Definition of Done (DoD) can be found at https://developers.minds.com/docs/handbook/how-we-work/#definition-of-done
--->

### Ticket(s) / Related Merge Requests

front#6216

### Summary of Changes

Change og:image for audio to be the audio thumbnail for an activity.

### Testing Considerations

- [x] With a thumbnail, og:image is the audio thumbnail.
- [x] Without a thumbnail, og:image is the default audio thumbnail.

### Deployment Considerations

Standard deployment.

### Regression Scope

Minor, impacts audio SEP SEO.

### Platform Affected (web, mobile, etc)

Web.

### Developer Testing Completed

Manual, unit (jasmine / karma).

### Screenshots / Screen Reco …

THIS CONFIGURATION’S PATCH · sha 0feb03086b40 · 3/3

--- a/src/app/modules/newsfeed/single/single.component.ts+++ b/src/app/modules/newsfeed/single/single.component.ts@@ -369,6 +369,18 @@       this.metaService.setOgImage(activity.custom_data['thumbnail_src']);     } +    if (activity.custom_type === 'audio') {+      const audioThumbnailSrc =+        activity.custom_data?.['thumbnail_src'] ||+        activity.thumbnail_src ||+        `${this.cdnAssetsUrl}assets/photos/audio.png`;+      this.metaService.setOgImage(audioThumbnailSrc, {+        width: 2000,+        height: 1000,+      });+      this.metaService.setThumbnail(audioThumbnailSrc);+    }+     if (activity.subtype === 'video' || activity.subtype === 'image') {       this.metaService.setOEmbed(activity.guid);     }

THE HUMAN TEAM’S PATCH · sha 9d527e3b8988 · shipped

--- a/src/app/modules/newsfeed/single/single.component.ts+++ b/src/app/modules/newsfeed/single/single.component.ts@@ -288,7 +288,9 @@       thumbnailSrc =         activity.custom_type === 'batch'           ? activity.custom_data[0]['src']-          : activity.thumbnail_src;+          : activity.custom_type === 'audio'+            ? activity.custom_data['thumbnail_src']+            : activity.thumbnail_src;        if (activity.site_membership && activity.paywall_thumbnail) {         thumbnailSrc =

AI QUALITY JUDGE · CLAUDE

Passed all three runs. It solves the same problem, audio posts having no preview image, by setting the image directly in the page's sharing metadata and adding a backup image for audio that has none.

The humans fixed it one step earlier, in the thumbnail picker itself. Different route, same tested outcome, and the workflow's version held up on every run where the loop's flaked.

2725Add-card loop3/3$0.35

base 4cb39d190eab · test: src/app/modules/payments/select-card/select-card.component.spec.ts · files changed: src/app/modules/payments/new-card-modal/new-card-modal.component.ts, src/app/modules/payments/select-card/select-card.component.ts · Fix add card loop minds#5179

THE TICKET, AS WRITTEN

<!---
Please read this!

The Definition of Done (DoD) can be found at https://developers.minds.com/docs/handbook/how-we-work/#definition-of-done
--->

### Ticket(s) / Related Merge Requests

minds#5179

### Summary of Changes

Fix loop when adding new card where Stripe window keeps opening.
Additionally fixes issue where upon closing window to add a new card, the window was being automatically reopened.

### Testing Considerations

Bound to https://olivia.oke.minds.io/

- [x] When adding a new card, when you are back on Minds, the card is loaded in and Stripe does not reopen.
- [x] When deciding not to add a new card on Stripe, when you are back on Minds, Stripe isn't automatically reopened. …

THIS CONFIGURATION’S PATCH · sha 07f43eab69f6 · 3/3

--- a/src/app/modules/payments/select-card/select-card.component.ts+++ b/src/app/modules/payments/select-card/select-card.component.ts@@ -108,11 +108,17 @@     const modal = this.modalService.present(NewCardModalComponent, {       data: {         onComplete: () => {+          this.paymentMethodId = '';           this.selected.next('');           this.loadCards();           modal.close();         },-      },+        onDismissIntent: () => {+          this.paymentMethodId = '';+          this.selected.next('');+          modal.close();+        },+      } as any,     });   } 

THE HUMAN TEAM’S PATCH · sha 28a32961cdde · shipped

--- a/src/app/modules/payments/new-card-modal/new-card-modal.component.ts+++ b/src/app/modules/payments/new-card-modal/new-card-modal.component.ts@@ -23,12 +23,10 @@    /**    * Modal options-   *-   * @param onComplete-   * @param onDismissIntent-   * @param defaults+   * @param { any } opts - modal options.+   * @returns { void }    */-  setModalData({ onComplete, onDismissIntent }) {+  setModalData({ onComplete, onDismissIntent }: any): void {     this.onComplete = onComplete || (() => {});     this.onDismissIntent = onDismissIntent || (() => {});   }--- a/src/app/modules/payments/select-card/select-card.component.ts+++ b/src/app/modules/payments/select-card/select-card.component.ts@@ -108,9 +108,15 @@     const modal = this.modalService.present(NewCardModalComponent, {       data: {         onComplete: () => {+          this.paymentMethodId = '';           this.selected.next('');           this.loadCards();-          modal.close();+          modal?.close();+        },+        onDismissIntent: () => {+          this.paymentMethodId = '';+          this.selected.next('');+          modal?.close();         },       },     });

AI QUALITY JUDGE · CLAUDE

Passed all three runs, matching the human fix almost line for line: both close paths clear the chosen card, clear the selection, and close the window.

The humans also tidied a type definition in a second file; the agent worked around it with a cast instead. Same behavior on everything the test checks.

2702Misconfigured domain upgrade3/3$0.14

base d67c453047e3 · test: src/app/modules/about/product-pages/components/common/button/button.component.spec.ts · files changed: src/app/modules/about/product-pages/components/common/button/button.component.ts, src/app/modules/multi-tenant-network/admin-console/tabs/billing/billing.component.ts · [front] Fix upgrading when domain is misconfigured minds#5113

THE TICKET, AS WRITTEN

<!---
Please read this!

The Definition of Done (DoD) can be found at https://developers.minds.com/docs/handbook/how-we-work/#definition-of-done
--->

### Ticket(s) / Related Merge Requests

* Issue card: minds#5113
* Engine MR: https://gitlab.com/minds/engine/-/merge_requests/1742

### Summary of Changes

See engine MR.

THIS CONFIGURATION’S PATCH · sha acb337ef6ada · 3/3

--- a/src/app/modules/about/product-pages/components/common/button/button.component.ts+++ b/src/app/modules/about/product-pages/components/common/button/button.component.ts@@ -64,7 +64,10 @@     this.inProgress = true;     // if there is a navigationUrl, navigate to it.     if (Boolean(this.data.navigationUrl)) {-      if (this.data.navigationUrl.startsWith('http')) {+      if (+        this.data.navigationUrl.startsWith('http') ||+        this.data.navigationUrl.startsWith('/api/')+      ) {         window.open(this.data.navigationUrl, '_blank');       } else {         this.router.navigateByUrl(this.data.navigationUrl);

THE HUMAN TEAM’S PATCH · sha 2dfc8f1f0d52 · shipped

--- a/src/app/modules/about/product-pages/components/common/button/button.component.ts+++ b/src/app/modules/about/product-pages/components/common/button/button.component.ts@@ -64,10 +64,17 @@     this.inProgress = true;     // if there is a navigationUrl, navigate to it.     if (Boolean(this.data.navigationUrl)) {-      if (this.data.navigationUrl.startsWith('http')) {+      if (+        this.data.navigationUrl.startsWith('http') ||+        this.data.navigationUrl.startsWith('/api/')+      ) {         window.open(this.data.navigationUrl, '_blank');       } else {-        this.router.navigateByUrl(this.data.navigationUrl);+        try {+          await this.router.navigateByUrl(this.data.navigationUrl);+        } catch (e: unknown) {+          console.error(e);+        }       }       this.inProgress = false;       return;--- a/src/app/modules/multi-tenant-network/admin-console/tabs/billing/billing.component.ts+++ b/src/app/modules/multi-tenant-network/admin-console/tabs/billing/billing.component.ts@@ -116,8 +116,7 @@                 'solid': true,                 'rounded': null,                 'navigationUrl':-                  siteUrl +-                  'api/v3/multi-tenant/billing/upgrade?plan=team&period=' ++                  '/api/v3/multi-tenant/billing/upgrade?plan=team&period=' +                   periodStr,                 'stripeProductKey': 'networks:team',                 'trialUpgradeRequest': null,@@ -154,8 +153,7 @@                 'solid': true,                 'rounded': null,                 'navigationUrl':-                  siteUrl +-                  'api/v3/multi-tenant/billing/upgrade?plan=community&period=' ++                  '/api/v3/multi-tenant/billing/upgrade?plan=community&period=' +                   periodStr,                 'stripeProductKey': 'networks:community',                 'trialUpgradeRequest': null,@@ -193,8 +191,7 @@                 'solid': true,                 'rounded': null,                 'navigationUrl':-                  siteUrl +-                  'api/v3/multi-tenant/billing/upgrade?plan=enterprise&period=' ++                  '/api/v3/multi-tenant/billing/upgrade?plan=enterprise&period=' +                   periodStr,                 'stripeProductKey': 'networks:enterprise',                 'trialUpgradeRequest': null,

AI QUALITY JUDGE · CLAUDE

Passed all three runs with the exact same fix as the human team: send /api/ links to the browser instead of the app's internal router. Identical to the loop's patch, same checksum.

The humans additionally added an error catch and corrected the link's address in a second file, beyond the tested behavior.

All configurations on this bench

ConfigurationSuccessRuns passedCost/fixTime/fix
Human baseline100%~$225 est.~25 min est.
Diagnose → fix hand-off · Claude Opus · this page100%27/27$0.2919s
Test-and-retry loop · Claude Opus 93%25/27$0.2919s
GPT-5.5 22%6/27$0.0330s
Claude Opus 11%3/27$0.046s
Gemini 3.1 Pro 0%0/27$0.0197s

full dataset: /data/runs/21670-minds-bugfix.json · task instances are public materials (open-source Minds, public git history); anyone can rerun this run · quality-judge comments: a separate Claude pass reads the ticket and both patches; commentary only — the executed test scores the run · measured and published by Recursiv Labs as a working prototype; not an official SPARK AI or UC San Diego publication

Working prototype by Recursiv Labs · not an official SPARK AI or UC San Diego publication · Data · © 2026